Research in Social Science for Contextualism- myassignmenthelp

Question: Discuss about theResearch in Social Science for Epistemic Contextualism. Answer: Based on the workshop for workshop two, it is quite apparent that there is need for us to realize who we are, how we can change the world, and also learn what social research is. Knowing the importance of research in the social sciences is quite important because it helps us to know as well as perform a critical analysis of the numerous processes through which the knowledge is developed using research (Campbell, 2015).That apart, it also enables us to know the various research methods that are used. It is quite evident that social research in the contemporary world can be used for the exploration of both the practice and the purpose of social research so that it can be used in the generation of the relevant bodies of knowledge as well as the comprehension or implementation of social change through professionals and professions who are known to be the major consumers of such knowledge (Witten Hammond, 2010). A social science has numerous purposes and among them includes the descripti on and explanation of behavior of both families and individuals. Social sciences can also be used in prediction of how individuals or families behave especially in response to their respective environments. Social sciences can also be used in suggestion of numerous ways through which the behavior of both families and the individuals can be managed. On the other hand, social research involves the social scientific concepts, theories as well as the methods that can be used in enhancing the comprehension of the social processes as well as problems that are encountered by the groups and the individuals in the society (Leach Davis, 2012). Based on workshop two, it is asserted that epistemology in philosophy implies to the study of knowing and which also entails ascertaining the relationship between the knower as well as the object of knowledge. In using epistemology, it is important for the researcher to ascertain how the knowledge is obtained, how people arrive at beliefs, and ascertaining how we can know and what we can actually know (Ley Teo, 2014). The resources also indicate that Epistemology is also the studying of the branch of philosophy is actually devoted towards not only the study of nature but also the sources as well as the limits that are associated with knowledge (Damnjanovic, 2012). On the other hand, the theory of knowledge which is embedded in theoretical perspectives is also well embedded in the technology. Both epistemology and ontology are quite important in the manner that we conduct research because not only do they enable us to know the type of research that we have to undertake but also how w e should conduct such research. It is important to note that while the deductive is known to start with the abstract ideas as well as the works and principle towards concrete details which are aimed at testing such ideas, this is not so for the inductive (Longhofer Floersch, 2014). This is because the inductive is known to start with the concrete details then ultimately works towards the general laws or principles, or the abstract ideas. While the reasoning deductive is known to apply the top-down approach, the reasoning inductive uses the bottom- up approach. References Campbell, S 2015, Of truths, concepts and social constructions, Nurse Researcher (2014), vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 6. Damnjanovic, N 2012, Epistemic Contextualism and Recognising Knowledge across Cultures. In Anthropological Forum (Vol. 22, No. 3, pp. 225-238). Routledge. Leach, J Davis, R 2012, Recognising and translating knowledge: Navigating the political, epistemological, legal and ontological. In Anthropological Forum (Vol. 22, No. 3, pp. 209-223). Routledge. Ley, D Teo, SY 2014, Gentrification in Hong Kong? Epistemology vs. Ontology. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 38: 12861303. Longhofer, J Floersch, J 2014, Values in a science of social work: Values-informed research and research-informed values. Research on Social Work Practice, 24(5), pp.527-534. Witten, K, Hammond, K 2010, What becomes of social science knowledge: New Zealand researchers' experiences of knowledge transfer modes and audiences. K?tuitui: New Zealand Journal of Social Sciences Online, 5(1), 3-12.